He pointed out that plenty of other Super Bowl ads don’t paint such a great a picture either.”When we think about commercials that offend us, we think of those that glorify antisocial behaviour like the scores of Super Bowl ads that are built around the crass objectification of women,” he said.”Unlike those ads, no one walks away from our commercials taking the causes we highlighted less seriously.”Unfortunately, the company realized too late that for many viewers, the ads themselves could be perceived as Groupon itself not taking worthy causes seriously.What do you think? Did you find the ads offensive?FILM REVIEW: Titanic 3D minute by minuteJames Cameron’s Titanic was always a marathon at three hours and counting. As it returns in 3D, Eli Glasner examines the experience minute by minute and discovers Cline Dion’s ubiquitous soundtrack, and James Cameron’s risible dialogue, have not improved with age. Continue reading this postSparkle trailer gives last glimpse of Whitney HoustonA trailer for the movie musical Sparkle was released Monday, giving us a glimpse of Whitney Houston’s last project.
Additionally, it will supply clothing and equipment worth an extra 2.5 million euros a year.Nike outbid Adidas, as well as Airness, a smaller privately owned French brand.total, the new contract will bring the Federation four and a half times more resources than the current contract, the federation said.Adidas has been the team supplier since 1972.But last summer, Nike lost out in a bid to outfit the German national team. The German Football Association opted instead to renew its deal with Adidas even though Nike offered 500 million euros to begin outfitting the team starting in 2011, a sum many times more than the Adidas deal.Adidas has sponsored the German national team since 1954.Sales of Nike football products have grown to some $1.5 billion from about $40 million in the early 1990s. Nike outfits national teams including Brazil and the United States, as well as a host of individual players and clubs..
“Asking for higher contributions is undoubtedly hard on people whose living standards are already being adversely affected by a pay freeze at a time of high inflation. And being asked to work longer before retiring is unwelcome news for many. Being hard and unwelcome is not, however, the same as being unfair..
It common to view style archetypes like “prep”, “workwear”, “scandinavian minimalism” etc etc as like. Predetermined styles that you can adopt. Under this view, many people would think of “having a style” as basically just picking out one of these “ready made” styles and wearing that everyday.